Legal-Sciences-peer-review-journals
Legal Science peer review is generally categorized basing on the field in which it has been submitted and the type of activity. The editor of the journal would assign the manuscript to an expert in the field once the manuscript is submitted to the journal. Usually 4-5 reviewers are consulted for this purpose and based on the reviewer workload and interest; a reviewer may accept or reject the invitation. The reviewer would be giving their evaluation to the editor indicating all the strong points,
weakness and suggestions if possible once manuscript is assigned to a reviewer. This reviewer’s comment can be viewed by author for their knowledge on manuscript quality. Editors select the best persons to enrich the manuscript since they possess are appointed on the basis of their contribution to the field. In peer review referee evaluation normally includes recommendation to strengthen the manuscript according to the latest developments as the reviewer would be an expert in the field concerned followed by the editor views. The accepted manuscripts will be published after the galley-proof corrections in the respective
journals after the final approval from the editor.
High Impact List of Articles
Relevant Topics in Medical