Mini Review - Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing (2023) Volume 11, Issue 4

Innovative Methods for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis, Risk Factor Identification, and Management

Augustine Mess*

World Diabetes Foundation, Bagsvaerd, Denmark


*Corresponding Author:
Augustine Mess
World Diabetes Foundation, Bagsvaerd, Denmark


Received: 30-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. FMBP-23-108021; Editor assigned: 03-Jul-2023, PreQC No. FMBP-23-108021 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-Jul-2023, QC No FMBP-23- 108021; Revised: 21-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. FMBP-23-108021 (R); Published: 28-Jul-2023, DOI: 10.37532/2048-9145.2023.11(4).62-64


Gestational diabetes mellitus is one of the biggest obstacles to bettering mother and child health. It affects around 5% of pregnancies and raises the risk of microsomal, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, and hyperbilirubinemia for both the mother and the unborn child. It also increases the chance of surgical vaginal birth and caesarean birth. The pathogenesis, epidemiology, risk factors, and therapy of gestational diabetes mellitus were the main topics of this review paper. Using the common keywords “Gestational Diabetes”, “Diabetes”, and “Pregnancy disorder”, a thorough evaluation of the literature was conducted using the main databases Scopus, Elsevier, and PubMed. In this article, we examine how gestational diabetes affects long-term mother and infant outcomes as well as potential health issues that would likely persist into the following generation. To comprehend the underlying pathophysiology of the condition and the urgent need to broaden our scientific toolkit in order to discover solutions to prevent and cure Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, we review the most recent clinical survey data and model of the disease. In addition to the difficulties now encountered in the epidemiology, diagnostic methods, pathophysiology, risk factor, and therapy of gestational diabetes mellitus, this discussion will also include advanced clinical care for gestational diabetes mellitus.


Gestational diabetesDiabetes Mellitus • Pathophysiology • Epidemiology


Pregnant women who have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which is common, run the risk of cardiovascular disease, caesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia, microsomal, neonatal hypoglycaemia, post-GDM type 2 diabetes mellitus, and an increased risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in their offspring. However, if GDM can be identified early enough, early treatments can be put in place to minimize any negative effects. Although the frequency of GDM is high in several emerging African nations (e.g., 8.2% in Nigeria and 9.5% in Tanzania), pregnant women have a lower chance of receiving sufficient medical care because of a shortage of trained healthcare professionals. Other barriers to prenatal care for women include poverty, insufficient healthcare, distances to hospitals, limited information availability, and cultural and traditional norms.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects around 5% of pregnancies, however numbers can vary substantially depending on the criteria used and the population’s demographics. Prevalence is expected to grow as long as the obesity pandemic exists. Pregnancies impacted by GDM carry a higher risk of complications for both the mother and the foetus, including microsomal, shoulder dystocia, new-born hypoglycaemia, and hyperbilirubinemia. Global epidemic levels are being reached for both obesity among women of reproductive age and hyperglycaemia during pregnancy (HIP). For the purposes of this investigation, we are following the diagnostic standards for HIP established by the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), which incorporate any rise in blood glucose levels during pregnancy as a component of the overall definition of HIP. The Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) research found that the connection between maternal BMI and hyperglycaemia and pregnancy issues was comparable. Both had greater rates of clinical new-born hypoglycaemia and obesity, neonatal hyperinsulinemia, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. They also had higher rates of excessive foetal development and primary caesarean delivery. However, the association between BMI and outcomes has a quadratic pattern with diminishing increments at the highest BMI categories, unlike the relationship between high blood sugar and unfavourable outcomes, which is frequently linear. Additionally, using clinical characteristics and biochemical tests, it may be possible to distinguish a subgroup of pregnant women with glucose levels that are within the normal range in the early stages of pregnancy but who have a high risk of developing “standard GDM,” which is typically diagnosed at around 24 to 28 weeks’ gestation. It makes sense, from a practical standpoint, to concentrate early intervention efforts on women who have prepregnancy hyperglycaemia, early-stage GDM, and high-risk GDM. Micro RNAs, which are essential for the metabolism of glucose, are abundant in ECVs. Micro-RNA-223 and micro- RNA 23a in first-trimester blood samples were strongly predictive of later GDM (AUROC 0.91), according to Yoffe et al’s exploratory case-control research. A recent cohort study has supported this finding for micro-RNA-233. Recently, much research on the relationships between noncoding RNAs and GDM has been conducted, and the findings are encouraging. As with other biomarkers, these intriguing findings from small studies need to be confirmed in different cohorts. The essential assays will also require updating in order to be employed in typical diagnostic laboratories at low cost and high throughput [1-5].

Haemoglobin A1C testing and blood sugar monitoring are other testing options. It’s crucial to speak with your healthcare physician about your alternatives as these both call for a great deal more investigation, time, and commitment on your part. Monitoring your blood sugar is precisely what it sounds like. You will use a blood sugar testing device and numerous finger pricks every day for a week to track your own blood sugar levels. Drawing blood is used in haemoglobin A1C testing, which tracks blood sugar levels over a three-month period. It is frequently used for people with diabetes who are not pregnant as an alternative to the standard Glucose testing. Additionally, it’s crucial to keep in mind that the GD test is really a screening procedure and not a true diagnostic. If the initial test results in failure, don’t freak out right away. You could be alright with the longer testing, though! Although we should monitor and treat gestational diabetes, there are alternatives to the standard screening. You’ll find the ideal strategy to monitor and ensure your health is optimal during your whole pregnancy by collaborating with your provider to develop a plan that works for you.

With the development or initial detection during pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a carbohydrate intolerance that causes hyperglycaemia of various severities. GDM poses concerns to both mothers and their unborn children since it is a severe case of glucose intolerance that is often discovered during any trimester of pregnancy. The most frequent pregnancy complication, GDM, has grown by more than 30% during the previous 20 years in several developing nations. More than 10% of pregnancies have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which raises the risk of pregnancy problems such preeclampsia, placental abnormalities, stillbirth, emergency caesarean sections, and the future onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in children and mothers [6-10].


Review of the global burden of GDM, which is growing, and the necessity of early detection of GDM for preventative measures. Through the discovery of biomarkers in the bio fluids of pregnant women, spectroscopic methods can be utilized to diagnose GDM. To find biomarkers that may be utilized as diagnostic tools, a large number of trials using various spectroscopic methods in various populations with various types of bio fluids were reviewed. The efficiency of spectroscopy was also evaluated. Numerous researchers examined the characterisation of metabolic abnormalities connected to the onset of GDM as well as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for GDM. Through the discovery of biomarkers in the bio fluids of pregnant women, vibrational spectroscopy can also be utilized to diagnose GDM. Before the biomarkers may be used in clinical practice, further research has to be done in bigger, prospective, and ethnically diverse groups. Additionally, FTIR and Raman spectroscopy (vibrational spectroscopy) may be combined with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to provide early diagnosis, and this is the trend towards a tailored medical strategy.


  1. Van den Anker J, Reed MD, Allegaert K et al. Developmental Changes in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.J Clin Pharmacol.58, 10-25 (2018).
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Aagaard L. Off-Label and Unlicensed Prescribing of Medicines in Paediatric Populations: Occurrence and Safety Aspects. Clin Pharmacol Toxicol.117, 215–218(2015).
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Gore R, Chugh PK, Tripathi CD. Pediatric Off-Label and Unlicensed Drug Use and Its Implications.Curr Clin Pharmacol.12, 18–25 (2018).
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Sketris, IS. American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria®Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria®for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.J Am Geriatr Soc.67, 674–694 (2019).
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Hill-Taylor B, Walsh KA, Stewart S et al. Effectiveness of the STOPP/START (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to the Right Treatment) criteria: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.J Clin PharmTher.41, 158–169 (2016).
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Tommelein E, Mehuys E, Petrovic M et al. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling older people across Europe: A systematic literature review.Eur J Clin Pharmacol.71, 1415–1427.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Prot-Labarthe S, Weil T, Angoulvant F et al. POPI (Pediatrics: Omission of Prescriptions and Inappropriate prescriptions): Development of a tool to identify inappropriate prescribing.PLoS ONE.9,25-68.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Corrick F, Conroy S, Sammons H et al. Paediatric Rational Prescribing: A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools.Int. J. Environ Res. Public Health.17, 1473-1496 (2015).
  16. Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Sadozai L, Sable S, Le E Roux et al. International consensus validation of the POPI tool (Pediatrics: Omission of Prescriptions and Inappropriate prescriptions) to identify inappropriate prescribing in pediatrics.PLoS ONE.15, 47-72 (2018).
  18. Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Barry E, Moriarty F, Boland F et al. The PIPc Study-application of indicators of potentially inappropriate prescribing in children (PIPc) to a national prescribing database in Ireland: A cross-sectional prevalence study.BMJ Open.8, 69-556 (2019).
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref

Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 1649

Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing received 1649 citations as per Google Scholar report

Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In