Case Report - Clinical Practice (2022) Volume 19, Issue 1

Successful percutaneous insertion of impella device using axillary artery complicated by radial artery occlusion

Corresponding Author:
Jack Xu
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United State
E-mail:
jaxu54@gmail.com

Received: 15 December, 2021, Manuscript No. M-49916; Editor assigned: 17 December, 2021, PreQC No. P-49916; Reviewed: 20 December, 2021, QC No. Q-49916; Revised: 02 January, 2022, Manuscript No. R-49916 Published: 10 January, 2022; DOI. 10.37532/ fmcp.2022.19(1).1815-1818

Abstract

A 77-year-old female with a history of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Aorto Femoral Bypass (AFB), and left subclavian artery stent presented for an elective hip replacement. Her postoperative course was complicated by chest pain with inferolateral ST depressions on ECG. She was found on coronary angiogram to have an 80% calcified lesion in the proximal Left Main Coronary Artery (LM). The decision was made for percutaneous revascularization with the percutaneous placement of an Impella CP via the right axillary artery for mechanical support. Under conscious sedation, the right axillary and radial arteries were accessed under ultrasound guidance. After the Impella sheath was advanced, there was the loss of arterial waveform on the 4 Fr radial sheath. The side port of the Impella sheath was connected to the side port of the radial sheath via an extension tubing, thereby maintaining perfusion of the right hand. The percutaneous coronary intervention was performed on the LM successfully with the Impella being able to be weaned off at the end of the procedure. The present case report highlights the percutaneous utilization of the right axillary artery for mechanical circulatory support in a patient with extensive PVD as well as acute limb ischemia.

Keywords

complex percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, acute coronary syndrome

Introduction

There has been increasing use of Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) devices to guide complex percutaneous coronary intervention or as a bridge to cardiac recovery [1]. Traditionally, the Impella CP is placed via femoral access but in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease, access may be limited [2,3]. If the device is placed in the upper extremity vessels, it usually necessitates a surgical cut-down with a surgeon, anesthesiologist, and a hybrid operating room with fluoroscopic capabilities [4,5]. However, a percutaneous approach can bypass some of those limitations.

Case Presentation

We present a 77-year-old female with a history of non-obstructive coronary artery disease, osteoarthritis, carotid stenosis, Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) with an Aorto Femoral Bypass (AFB), and a left subclavian stent who came to the hospital for an elective left hip replacement. She underwent a left total hip replacement but her postoperative course was complicated by chest pain with >1 mm down sloping inferolateral ST depressions on electrocardiogram (FIGURE 1). The patient was deemed to have a non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and was scheduled for a left heart catheterization. Before cardiac catheterization, the patient felt numbness in her right foot with nonpalpable pulses in her right lower extremity. Vascular surgery evaluated the patient and was concerned for right limb aortofemoral bypass occlusion. After a multidisciplinary team discussion, the decision was made for a coronary angiogram before vascular revascularization.

clinical-practice-Electrocardiogram

Figure 1: Electrocardiogram showing ST depressions in the inferolateral leads.

Fluoroscopy of the aorta showed a porcelain aorta (FIGURE 2). The left heart catheterization showed an 80% calcified lesion in the proximal Left Main Coronary Artery (LM) with no other obstructive coronary lesions (FIGURE 3A) and a left ventricular end-diastolic pressure of 31 mm Hg. An echocardiogram showed an ejection fraction of 55%-60% with normal diastolic function, no significant aortic stenosis, and no wall motion abnormalities.

clinical-practice-Fluoroscopy

Figure 2: Fluoroscopy showing porcelain aorta.

clinical-practice-angiogram

Figure 3: A) Coronary angiogram showing LM stenosis; (B) Rotational atherectomy in the LM; (C) Post atherectomy angiogram.

After the patient was deemed to be at prohibitive surgical risk, the decision was made for percutaneous revascularization with the percutaneous placement of an Impella CP via the right axillary artery for mechanical support. The femoral arteries were not accessed due to the concern of loss of flow in the left AFB in the context of acute thrombotic occlusion of the right AFB. Under conscious sedation, the right axillary and radial arteries were accessed under ultrasound guidance, with preclosure of the puncture site with Perclose ProGlide devices. After the Impella sheath was advanced, there was the loss of arterial waveform on the 4 Fr radial sheath. The side port of the Impella sheath was connected to the side port of the radial sheath via an extension tubing, thereby maintaining perfusion of the right hand. Thereafter, single access was used to insert a 7 Fr sheath into the Impella sheath. Rotational atherectomy was performed using a 1.5 burr, followed by IVUS guided stent placement in the LM, using 4.0 mm × 15 mm drug-eluting stent, which was post dilated with a 4.5 mm × 8 mm non-compliant balloon (FIGURE 3B and FIGURE 3C). Impella was weaned off at the end of the procedure and the Perclose sutures were successfully deployed.

The patient then underwent right AFB limb thrombectomy with systemic heparinization but during the procedure, the patient was hypotensive requiring multiple units of packed red blood cells so an angiogram was done to evaluate for bleeding in the right axillary artery. An angiogram showed extravasation so a covered stent was placed.

Discussion

Percutaneous large-bore access for MCS devices has become a complex and evolving field [1,5]. Patients who need this support oftentimes have multiple comorbidities such as severe PVD. Femoral access is the most common access for Impella devices but in some patients with significant lower extremity PVD, largebore arterial access is not always feasible in the femoral artery [1]. In addition, femoral access necessitates bed rest in patients who could potentially benefit from in-hospital physical therapy.

Impella placement in the upper extremity is usually placed via a surgical cutdown of the axillary artery along with a conduit graft [1,2]. This procedure requires an anesthesiologist, surgeon, and usually a hybrid operating room with fluoroscopic imaging availability [1]. However, a percutaneous approach could enable placement in a standard catheterization laboratory and possibly avoid the need for surgical cut-down or anesthesia [1,4]. It would also allow for patients to participate in rehabilitation.

The present case report highlights the percutaneous utilization of the right axillary artery for MCS in a patient with extensive PVD as well as acute limb ischemia. It also highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach when dealing with complex presentations as well as highly morbid patients.

Conclusion

Typically, Impella devices are inserted via femoral access but when severe PVD precludes the use of lower extremity access, we believe that an upper extremity percutaneous approach can be used in a traditional cardiac catheterization laboratory. We believe that ipsilateral radial access is necessary if the large bore sheath occludes flow to the rest of the upper extremity. In our case, we were able to maintain perfusion of the hand using an extension between the Impella sheath and a radial sheath.

References

 
Awards Nomination

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Journal Metrics:

Impact Factor: 12.24
Journal Citescore: 10.62
h-index: 29
PubMed NLM ID:  101579384
Journal Acceptance Rate: 40%
Article processing time : 30-45 Days

Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 3847

Clinical Practice received 3847 citations as per Google Scholar report


Clinical Practice peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

flyer
flyer