Mini Review - Advanced Materials Science Research (2023) Volume 6, Issue 1

Metallo-supramolecular modules as a model for the study of materials

Velten Fletcher*

Department of biological and biomedical materials Australia

*Corresponding Author:
Velten Fletcher
Department of biological and biomedical materials Australia

Received: 30-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. aaamsr-23-87776; Editor assigned: 01-Feb-2023, Pre-QC No. aaamsr-23-87776PQ); Reviewed: 15- Feb-2023, QC No. aaamsr-23-87776; Revised: 18-Feb-2023, Manuscript No. aaamsr-23-87776 (R); Published: 25-Feb-2023; DOI: 10.37532/ aaasmr.2023.6(1).10-12


The various thermodynamic, kinetic, chemical, physical, and structural properties of metal ions embedded in a particular ligand field make these systems promising candidates for active components in functional materials. Methodologies for placing these active modules in appropriate device architectures, such as thin films or mesophases, are a major obstacle. With an emphasis on materials science, this review highlights recent developments in extended polymeric Metallo-supramolecular systems and discrete polyoxometalates.


Metallo-Supramolecular chemistry • Metal Ion Coordination • Polymers • Polyelectrolyte Amphiphile Complex • Polyoxometalates • Surfactant-Encapsulated Cluster • Mesophases • Nanostructure • Nanotechnology


Metal ions organized in a protein matrix play a crucial role in the mechanisms of photosynthesis and respiratory reactions, demonstrating the intricate relationship between structure and properties. Electron transfer and energy conversion are extremely effective when the metal ions are precisely arranged in three-dimensional (three-dimensional) space. In addition, biological systems are able to adapt their structure and function in response to external stimuli as a result of the weak and competitive interactions that keep the components in place. Information signalling and translation also require responsiveness [1]. The capacity for self-repair and self-replication of biological systems is one of their most fascinating features. An overarching theme in current materials science and device design is the introduction of specific and selective molecular interactions to guide the association of functional modules, inspired by nature. Since a long time ago, molecular-based devices have been recognized for their technological and functional advantages. However, it has only recently begun to form functional Nano scaled or molecular devices from non-biological components or modules [2]. Device fabrication at the nanometre scale can essentially be divided into two distinct approaches: self-assembly and lithography. Self-assembly is said to be an important step toward the production of next-generation molecular materials, whereas lithography permits the creation of ever-smaller structures. Parallel fabrication, dimension control, component alignment, and repair mechanisms are among the advantages of self-assembly. Because material and device performance are heavily reliant on the spatial arrangement of the functional modules, the current obstacle in the field of self-assembly is therefore the creation of strategies to combine, orient, and arrange structural and functional modules in predictable ways [3]. It will also be beneficial to collect and arrange the components in surface-confined structures in order to support, handle, manipulate, and operate devices at the nanoscopic scale. However, there are no standard methods for achieving this goal. Supramolecular science has been focusing on the development of novel methods for the construction of molecular objects with nanoscopic dimensions and the ability to form microscopic patterns. The goal of nanotechnology is to develop machinery and devices based on molecules in nanoscopic dimensions, also known as functional supramolecular architectures that process particular fundamental steps in a logical order of matter/signal transformations [4]. There are numerous potential applications for molecular devices; Chemosensory for generating electric signals from molecular recognition events and molecular switches and logical elements for highly integrated circuits are among the “hot topics” currently under investigation. Nano sized supramolecular architectures can be produced in sufficient quantities using self-assembling supramolecular systems, which are both practical and effective [5]. Through a series of recognition, growth, and termination steps, the final supramolecular entity spontaneously emerges from a chemical library of appropriately shaped molecular building blocks. Using ligand–metal ion interactions, – interactions, or hydrogen-bonding-mediated recognition processes, discrete Nano sized and extended supramolecular assemblies have been created. Self-assembly gains an additional dimension when supramolecular modules and amphiphile are used as structural components. The spontaneous interaction of amphiphile with supramolecular modules is fuelled by the release of counter ions, electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, and a wide variety of structures, including thermo tropic and lipotropic mesophases [6].

Polymers with a metallic structure

Recent research has looked at coordination polymers containing macromolecular ligands. Kinetically inert polymers that are comparable in terms of their polymer physics and properties to conventional, covalent polymers are formed when the binding constants between ligands and metal ions are extremely high. Polymeric assemblies do not form in solution but only in the solid state if the binding constants are low. On the other hand, macromolecular assemblies form in solution when the binding constants, or interactions between the ligands and metal ions, are of intermediate strength [7]. Because the ligand design and the pH, temperature, and binding constant are all factors, this is not necessarily a limitation. Therefore, it is possible to locate a window of opportunity where soluble metallo-supramolecular polymers can form and be studied by carefully selecting the boundary conditions of self-assembly. Metal ions and ligands can be used to directly build coordination polymers. Standard analytical methods can easily characterize polymers made from kinetically inert transition–metal complexes in solution; however, polymers made from kinetically labile transition–metal complexes in solution have only recently been successfully characterized in detail. The vast majority of the resulting networks or metal-organic frameworks are characterized as crystalline solids when they are isolated. Because of the typically low binding constants, no polymeric assemblies are formed in solution [8]. The solid state is the only place where the coordination network is. In previous reviews, the remarkable variety of the resulting framework architectures has been extensively discussed. The particular uptake of gases through the control of functional group chemistry and the windows, pores, and channels of the architecture is perhaps the most promising application of MOFs because of their large apparent surface area as demonstrated by the formation of the starting materials upon the addition of excess pyridine, the process of particle formation can be completely reversed. It is possible to tailor the chemical and physical properties of the resulting polymers and particles by selecting the BMSB ligand, the type of mutilation, and the ancillary ligands [9]. The fact that the particles remain stable in both water and common organic solvents is interesting. Fluorescence from both the complex and the particles is made possible by the inclusion of binaphtyl in the ligand. The electronic nature of the metal ions can also be altered thanks to the ancillary ligands. Increasing the ancillary ligands -donor capability, for instance, causes the absorption maximum to shift red. These materials are attractive for separation and catalysis because they can be made enantiopure. Maeda recently applied this idea to create Nano scale structures from dipyrrin ligands [10].

Monolayers and multilayers made by Langmuir

We can investigate surface activity and provide molecular-level control to construct layered materials through LB film transfer thanks to the established conditions at the air–water interface. The following is a general illustration of the Langmuir monolayer preparation and LB transfer concept. A known quantity of the sample is dissolved in a volatile solvent that is water-immiscible, and the solution is spread across the water surface of a Langmuir trough. A monolayer remains at the air–water interface after the solvent has evaporated. This monolayer is then compressed with a moving barrier, and the surface pressure is measured and displayed as a function of the corresponding area, A. This reveals details about the monolayer’s phase behavior as well as information about the size of the molecules. By dipping a suitable substrate through the interface at constant pressure, Langmuir monolayers can be transferred to solid substrates. Lamellar multilayers typically result from repeated monolayer transfer. Nagel and Oertel were the first to report polymer–metal complexes at the air–water interface and the associated LB multilayers. A metal ion complex from the sub phase bound to Langmuir monolayer recognition sites at the air–water interface in this method. Another method involves directly spreading the preassembled water-insoluble metallo-supramolecular assembly on the water’s surface. For instance, using benzene and DH, the aforementioned PAC can be spread.


Methods for incorporating these Nano scaled self-assembled materials or objects into devices on a production scale have lagged significantly, despite an increase in the number of materials reported in recent years. These self-assembled systems will have to self-organize into hierarchical structures that may also serve as connections to the macroscopic world, either simultaneously or in the future. As a result, the structural organization of supramolecular assemblies must be controlled for many of these devices that are based on organic or hybrid inorganic–organic compounds, in a manner that is analogous to biological systems In addition.


  1. Sarikaya M, Tamerler C, Schulten K. Molecular biomimetic: nanotechnology through biology. Nat Mater. 2, 85-577 (2003).
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref 

  3. Lehn JM. Toward self-organization and complex matter. Science. 29, 2400-2700 (2002).
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Stoddart JF. Molecular machines. Acc Chem Res. 34, 410-411 (2001).
  6. Google Scholar

  7. Lehn JM. Toward complex matter: supramolecular chemistry and self-organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99, 4763 (2002).
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Thunemann AF. Polyelectrolyte–surfactant complexes synthesis, structure and materials aspects. Prog Polym Sci. 27, 1473 (2002).
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Ober CK, Wegner G. Polyelectrolyte–Surfactant Complexes in the Solid State: Facile building blocks for self‐organizing materials. Adv Mater. 9, 17 (1997).
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Alam MS, Stromsdorfer S, Dremov V. Addressing the metal centers of [2x2] CoII4 grid-type complexes by STM/STS. Angew Chem Int Edn Engl. 44, 7896-900 (2005).
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Long DL, Burkholder E, Cronin L. Polyoxometalates clusters, nanostructures and materials: from self-assembly to designer materials and devices. Chem Soc Rev. 36, 105 (2007).
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Muller A, Kogerler P, Dress AWM. Giant metal-oxide-based spheres and their topology: from pentagonal building blocks to keplerates and unusual spin systems. Coord Chem Rev. 222, 193-218 (2001).
  18. Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Sadakane M, Steckhan E. Electrochemical Properties of Polyoxometalates as Electro catalysts. Chem Rev. 98, 219 (1998).
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref