Research Article - International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology (2021) Volume 16, Issue 2

Knowledge, attitude, and misconceptions towards osteoporosis among patients with musculoskeletal health problems

Corresponding Author:
Hany M Ali
Department of Rheumatology
Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
E-mail: hanyaly79@azhar.edu.eg

Abstract

Purpose/Introduction:To determine the level of awareness and knowledge about osteoporosis among a sample of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. Methods: Through a cross-sectional study on patients with musculoskeletal disorders either degenerative or inflammatory (aged 18-62 years), 1200 participants were interviewed and responded to a prepared validated questionnaire about the knowledge and attitude towards Osteoporosis (OP) and its potential complications as fragility fractures and kyphosis. Results: Seventy eight percent (936) of the studied subjects know osteoporosis (of them only 930 agreed to complete the study) while 22% did not know a disease called osteoporosis and did not complete the remaining questions. A positive effect was found for educational level, occupation, and residence on knowledge of osteoporosis (P=0.000, P=0.001, P=00.002 respectively). Among those who completed the questionnaire, the majority (72.2% and 82%)were found to have the misconceptions that OP can lead to joint deformities and bone pain which reflected that their knowledge about the disease lacks the required in-depth awareness. Conclusion: There are variable degrees of knowledge and attitudes towards patients with musculoskeletal disorders which are affected by multiple factors including educational level, occupation, residence and marital status. However, the in-depth awareness about the disease is highly limited and efforts should be done to overcome this point as a first step to prevent the disease. Summary: Awareness and knowledge about Osteoporosis (OP) and its risk factors is highly limited and efforts should be done to overcome this point as a first step to prevent the disease.

Keywords

osteoporosis ● knowledge ● co-morbidities ● musculoskeletal diseases

Introduction

Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic disease characterized by low bone mass and deteriorated bony tissue microarchitecture due to abnormalities of bone turnover resulting in fragility and higher exposure to fracture risk [1]. Many criteria for osteoporosis diagnosis have been proposed. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), osteoporosis is defined as a Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the hip and/or the spine at least 2.5 Standard Deviations (SD) below the mean peak bone mass of young healthy adults as determined by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) [2]. Osteoporosis is well known as an important worldwide health problem, affecting about 200 million people [3]. More than 40% of women and 20% of men suffering from OP are vulnerable to have an osteoporotic (fragility) fracture throughout their life [4].

Osteoporosis is associated with a mortality rate ranges from 15 to 30% which is near to mortality rate in breast cancer and stroke [5]. It is a widely recognized, silent metabolic disease that manifests clinical signs only after sufficient damage has already been done. In 2014, the National Osteoporosis Foundation found that a total of 54 million adults aged more than 50 years in the USA are affected by OP and low bone mass [6].

In Egypt, assessment of numerous performed studies revealed that 53.9% of postmenopausal women have osteopenia and 28.4% have OP. On the other hand, 26% of men have osteopenia and 21.9% have OP [7]. The prevalence of OP is increasing steadily and ongoing as a major public health problem in concordance with the universal increasing life expectancy; especially more rapidly in the developing countries [8]. It is supposed that by 2050, the Egyptian population will be close to 130 million inhabitants, and more than 30% of its population will be aged 50 years and over [9]. Based on the fact that rheumatic diseases are not well included in the mass media in our region and that the rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases are learned by the internists and not the rheumatologists in most of our universities, we supposed that there is a deficiency in the knowledge related to these diseases. As part of a systemic project to evaluate the awareness and attitude towards rheumatic and musculoskeletal disorders among our patients, this study aimed to determine the level of awareness and knowledge about osteoporosis among a sample of patients with musculoskeletal health problems.

Methods

Through a cross-sectional study, 1200 participants (18- 62 years) of those attending the outpatient clinics of rheumatology of our university hospitals between June 2019 to January 2020 complaining of musculoskeletal diseases either degenerativeor inflammatory were interviewed and provided with detailed information about the study. An informed consent was provided from each participant. The work conforms to the ethical standards of the Helsinki declaration and was approved by the local institutional ethical committee of Al-Azhar university. The participants responded to a prepared questionnaire about the knowledge and attitude towards Osteoporosis (OP) and its potential complications as fragility fractures and kyphosis.

The questionnaire was proposed and constructed by the first author and then revised, refined and adapted by the rest of the authors. To validate the survey, a pilot analysis was done and the second and third authors then revised the accuracy of the Arabic translation of the version provided, its design, content and easiness to fill in. The information collected included age, sex, geographic area, educational level, and a response to direct questions in the form of "do you know OP? answered by yes or no. Those who know the disease were asked to complete the study and respond to the close-ended questions about "can OP lead to joint deformities, pain, fragility fracture and kyphosis? Answered by yes, no, I don't know. The aim of the questions about the causality relationship between OP and joint deformities as well as bone pain was to examine the in-depth knowledge of the participants as these two questions reflect the misconceptions about OP that it can lead to pain and joint deformity. Patients were contacted face-to-face and their answers were recorded patient by patient and then transferred into an excel sheet.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or frequency and percentages. The significance was assessed using the Pearson Chi- square test for comparison of the given normally distributed variables of the two groups (those who know and those who don't know). P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 1200 participants with musculoskeletal health problems were included in the study with different levels of education (Illiterate 39.0%, before high education 48.3% and highly educated 12.7%), occupation (No work 62.2%, crafted9.3%, daily worker 12.8%, employee 6.7% and private job 9%) gender (male 41.2% and female 58.8%), marital status (single 17.2%, married 77.3%, divorced 1.5% and widowed 4%) and residence (rural 75.8% and urban 24.2%) as shown and detailed in Table 1. Their knowledge about osteoporosis was tested by the question (Do you know a disease called osteoporosis?). 270 subjects did not know osteoporosis (22%) and not allowed to complete the questions. From 936 (78%) subjects know the disease only (930) agreed to complete the questions about comorbidities. A moderate knowledge was found about osteoporosis comorbidities among those who completed the study and no effect was found for the marital status and gender) on the level of knowledge (P=032 and 0.182 respectively). A significant effect has been found for education (P=0.000), residence (P=0.001) and occupation (P=0.002) (Table 1).

Table 1. Knowledge about OP: Do you know a disease called OP?

The study Population Who know osteoporosis (n=936) Who don't know osteoporosis (n=264) Total (n=1200)
No. % No. % No. %
Education level:
Illiterate 272 58.1 196 41.9 468 39
before high education 518 89.3 62 10.7 580 48.3
High 146 96.1 6 3.9 152 12.7
Pearson Chi-squire: 91.698; P: 0.000 **
Occupation:
No work 582 78 164 22 746 62.2
Crafted 92 82.1 20 17.9 112 9.3
Daily worker 96 62.3 58 37.7 154 12.8
Employee 70 87.5 10 12.5 80 6.7
Private job 96 88.9 12 11.1 108 9
Pearson Chi-squire: 17.402; P: 0.002 **
Gender:
Male 372 75.3 122 24.7 494 41.2
Female 564 79.9 142 20.1 706 58.8
Pearson Chi-squire: 1.779; P: 0.182 #
Marital status:
Single 176 85.4 30 14.6 206 17.2
Married 718 77.4 210 22.6 928 77.3
Divorced 14 77.8 4 22.2 18 1.5
Widowed 28 58.3 20 41.7 48 4
Pearson Chi-squire: 8.837; P: 0.032 *
Residence:
Rural 682 74.9 228 25.1 910 75.8
Urban 254 87.6 36 12.4 290 24.2
Pearson Chi-squire: 10.240; P: 0.001 **
Total 936 78 264 22 1200 100

The majority of patients (72.26 %) were found to have the misconception that OP can lead to joint deformities No effect was found forthe educational level (P: 0.170), occupation (P: 0.272), gender (P: 0.284), and residence (P: 0.154) on this misconception (Table 2).

Table 2. Knowledge about joint deformities and osteoporosis. Can OP lead to joint deformities?

The study Population Yes (672) No (26) I don't know (232) Total (930)
No. % No. % No. % No. %
Education level
Illiterate 180 66.7 6 2.2 84 31.1 270 29
before high education 374 72.5 18 3.5 124 24 516 55.5
High 118 81.9 2 1.4 24 16.7 144 15.5
Pearson Chi-squire: 11.592; P: 0.170 #
Occupation:
No work 406 70.2 12 2.1 160 27.7 578 62.2
Crafted 58 64.4 4 4.4 28 31.1 90 9.7
Daily worker 76 79.2 6 6.2 14 14.6 96 10.3
Employee 54 77.1 2 2.9 14 20 70 7.5
Private job 78 81.2 2 2.1 16 16.7 96 10.3
Pearson Chi-squire: 9.903; P:0.272 #
Gender
Male 282 76.2 10 2.7 78 21.1 370 39.8
Female 390 69.6 16 2.9 154 27.5 560 60.2
Pearson Chi-squire: 2.516; P: 0.284 #
Marital status:
Single 142 80.7 6 3.4 28 15.9 176 18.9
Married 504 70.6 18 2.5 192 26.9 714 76.8
Divorced 10 71.4 2 14.3 2 14.3 14 1.5
Widowed 16 61.5 0 0 10 38.5 26 2.8
Pearson Chi-squire: 9.786; P: 0.134 #
Residence
Rural 486 71.5 14 2.1 180 26.5 680 73.1
Urban 186 74.4 12 4.8 52 20.8 250 26.9
Pearson Chi-squire: 3.743; P: 0.154 #
Total 672 72.3 26 2.8 232 24.9 930 100

On the other hand, the majority of our patients (82%) also were found to have the misconception that OP can lead to bone pain. No effect was found for the educational level (P: 0.619), occupation (P: 0.419), gender (P: 0.955), and residence (P: 0.346) on knowledge about bone pain caused by OP (Table 3). This indicates that our participants have superficial knowledge but not true awareness about the disease.71% of patients knew that OP can lead to fragility fracture while 26% of them don’t know this important relation. No effect was found for the educational level (P: 0.084), occupation (P: 0.298), gender (P: 0.931), marital status (P 0:217) and residence (P: 0.534) on knowledge about fragility fracture caused by osteoporosis? (Table 4).

Table 3. Knowledge about bone pain and osteoporosis. Can OP lead to bone pain?

The study Population Yes (764) No (18) I don't know (148) Total (930)
No. % No. % No. % No. %
Education level
Illiterate 212 78.5 4 1.5 54 20 270 29
before high education 430 83.3 8 1.6 78 15.1 516 55.5
High 122 84.7 6 4.2 16 11.1 144 15.5
Pearson Chi-squire: 6.252; P: 0.619 #
Occupation:
No work 470 81.3 12 2.1 96 16.6 578 62.2
Crafted 68 75.6 2 2.2 20 22.2 90 9.7
Daily worker 76 79.2 4 4.2 16 16.7 96 10.3
Employee 60 85.7 0 0 10 14.3 70 7.5
Private job 90 93.8 0 0 6 6.2 96 10.3
Pearson Chi-squire: 8.150; P:0.419 #
Gender
Male 304 82.2 8 2.2 58 15.7 370 39.8
Female 460 82.1 10 1.8 90 16.1 560 60.2
Pearson Chi-squire: 0.093; P: 0.955 #
Marital status:
Single 154 87.5 4 2.3 18 10.2 176 18.9
Married 586 82.1 14 2 114 16 714 76.8
Divorced 6 42.9 0 0 8 57.1 14 1.5
Widowed 18 69.2 0 0 8 30.8 26 2.8
Pearson Chi-squire: 13.395; P: 0.037 #
Residence
Rural 548 80.6 14 2.1 118 17.4 680 73.1
Urban 216 86.4 4 1.6 30 12 250 26.9
Pearson Chi-squire: 2.121; P: 0.346 #
Total 764 8 18 1.9 148 15.9 930 100

Table 4. Knowledge about fragility fractures caused by osteoporosis. Can OP lead to fragility fractures?

The study Population Yes (660) No (30) I don't know (240) Total (930)
No. % No. % No. % No. %
Education level
Illiterate 186 68.9 4 1.5 80 29.6 270 29
before high education 350 67.8 24 4.7 142 27.5 516 55.5
High 124 86.1 2 1.4 18 12.5 144 15.5
Pearson Chi-squire: 13.911; P: 0.084 #
Occupation:
No work 398 68.9 16 2.8 164 28.4 578 62.2
Crafted 64 71.1 2 2.2 24 26.7 90 9.7
Daily worker 62 64.6 6 6.2 28 29.2 96 10.3
Employee 56 80 4 5.7 10 14.3 70 7.5
Private job 80 83.3 2 2.1 14 14.6 96 10.3
Pearson Chi-squire: 9.553; P: 0.298 #
Gender
Male 266 71.9 12 3.2 92 24.9 370 39.8
Female 394 70.4 18 3.2 148 26.4 560 60.2
Pearson Chi-squire: 0.143; P: 0.931 #
Marital status:
Single 136 77.3 2 1.1 38 21.6 176 18.9
Married 504 70.6 26 3.6 184 25.8 714 76.8
Divorced 6 42.9 0 0 8 57.1 14 1.5
Widowed 14 53.8 2 7.7 10 38.5 26 2.8
Pearson Chi-squire: 8.305; P: 0.217 #
Residence
Rural 47670.0 70 20 2.9 184 27.1 680 73.1
Urban 18473.6 73.6 10 4 56 22.4 250 26.9
Pearson Chi-squire: 1.253; P: 0.534 #
Total 660 71 30 3.2 240 25.8 930 100

32.7 % of consulted participants were found to have the knowledge that OP can lead to kyphosis. No effect was found for the educational level (P: 0.547), occupation (P: 0.177), gender (P: 0.236), and residence (P: 0.673) on knowledge about this causality (Table 5).

Table 5. Knowledge about the relation between kyphosis and osteoporosis. Can OP lead to kyphosis?

The study Population Yes (580) No (46) I don't know (304) Total (930)
No. % No. % No. % No. %
Education level
Illiterate 162 60 10 3.7 98 36.3 270 29
before high education 322 62.4 26 5 168 32.6 516 55.5
High 96 66.7 10 6.9 38 26.4 144 15.5
Pearson Chi-squire: 6.904; P: 0.547 #
Occupation:
No work 356 61.6 22 3.8 200 34.6 578 62.2
Crafted 48 53.3 8 8.9 34 37.8 90 9.7
Daily worker 60 62.5 10 10.4 26 27.1 96 10.3
Employee 42 60 4 5.7 24 34.3 70 7.5
Private job 74 77.1 2 2.1 20 20.8 96 10.3
Pearson Chi-squire: 11.463; P: 0.177 #
Gender
Male 228 61.6 26 7 116 31.4 370 39.8
Female 352 62.9 20 3.6 188 33.6 560 60.2
Pearson Chi-squire: 2.885; P: 0.236 #
Marital status:
Single 106 60.2 12 6.8 58 33 176 18.9
Married 456 63.9 30 4.2 228 31.9 714 76.8
Divorced 8 57.1 2 14.3 4 28.6 14 1.5
Widowed 10 38.5 2 7.7 14 53.8 26 2.8
Pearson Chi-squire: 5.752; P: 0.452 #
Residence
Rural 416 61.2 34 5 230 33.8 680 73.1
Urban 164 65.6 12 4.8 74 29.6 250 26.9
Pearson Chi-squire: 0.793; P: 0.673 #
Total 580 62 446 4.9 304 32.7 930 100

Discussion

Awareness and knowledge about OP significantly decrease the risk of fractures and other comorbidities. Also, a healthy lifestyle and healthy behaviors decrease the fracture risk of OP [10]. Different factors such as educational level and occupation may affect the level of awareness about OP, OP fragility fractures and other comorbidities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study about knowledge and misconceptions of OP among patients with musculoskeletal diseases.

In our study, 78% of the studied subjects know the disease with the level of knowledge about osteoporosis was affected by the educational status, residence, and occupation wile no sex effect was found. This may be more or less similar to a study conducted on a sample of pre and postmenopausal women in 2015 showed that 95.1% of the studied population was familiar with OP. However, their knowledge about the disease risk factors and comorbidities was considered moderate [11]. The same was reported in Saudi Arabia as 82% of participants in a community-based study had heard about OP with significant effect of the educational level, gender, occupation, age, and income on their awareness [12].

Ergen and Akcaireporteda reported a high level of awareness among Turkish women with postmenopausal OP (90.5%) [13] however, another earlier multicenter Turkish study conducted by Kutsal et al. reported a relatively low level of knowledge about the disease (54%) [14].

Nguyen et al reported a high level of awareness among Vietnamese women (81.6%) [15].On the other hand, a study performed on healthy subjects in North Egypt in 2015 [16] using Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT) [17] revealed poor knowledge about OP. In the same context, another Egyptian study performed in 2018 revealed that a low percentage of pre and post-menopausal women were aware of OP and fracture (16.67% & 12.96% and 30.65% & 19.35% respectively) [18]. The same was recently reported by Iranian study as the majority (81%) of females were found unaware about OP and its complications [19]. Also, a poor knowledge of OP was reported among female nursing school students in Damascus [20] as well as among female students in Saudi college [21].

In a recent review article on the prevalence and awareness of OP in the area of the Middle East and North Africa, Geita and Hammam reported a variable but high prevalence of OP in this area with an overall lack of knowledge and awareness about the disease, its risk factors, preventive measures and complications. The authors also reported a limited number of studies regarding the established prevalence of osteoporotic fractures [22]. In a dissertation presented in 2000 by Schnieder at the University of Montana about the awareness of OP prevention and its impact on the bone health conducted on 73 American postmenopausal women, the author reported inadequate knowledge about the preventive measures for OP estimated as 77%. While there was an insignificant relationship between the overall awareness of how to prevent the disease and the bone health of the studied women. Nevertheless, significant differences had been found between certain aspects of the prevention program and the participant's bone health measured by DXA [23]. Similarly, low awareness of OP among Indian postmenopausal women was reported before [24]. A pilot study in Qatar performed on 90 OP patients reported variable degrees of knowledge among patients affected by the level of education and recommended the need for more indepth awareness about the disease [25].

In this study, we intended to evaluate two misconceptions commonly encountered in the daily practice to examine in depth the knowledge of those stating that they know the disease. As expected, the majority of our participants were found to have misconceptions that OP can lead to joint deformities and bone pain reflecting the lack of true knowledge about OP. The educational level, occupation, residence in urban areas and gender did not affect their knowledge regarding these two points as well as regarding the causality of OP with fragility fracture and kyphosis.

Our study has many limitations as the low sample size of participants, the lack of questions about the modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors of the disease. Furthermore, the used questionnaire didn’t include the types of osteoporosis as the drug-induced and disease-related OP as well as the knowledge of the studied participants about the tools of measuring bone mineral density.

Conclusion

There are variable degrees of knowledge and attitude towards osteoporosis among patients with musculoskeletal conditions that were affected by multiple factors including educational level, occupation, residence and marital status.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Board of Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

References