Editorial - Interventional Cardiology (2016) Volume 8, Issue 3

Double high risk atrial fibrillation patients

Corresponding Author:
Antonio L Aguilar-Shea
Centro de Salud Puerta de Madrid, Spain
Tel: +34918806699
E-mail: antonio.aguilar@salud.madrid.org

Submitted: 14 April 2016; Accepted: 15 April 2016; Published online: 19 April 2016

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent arrhythmia which must be managed properly. As part of the evaluation and treatment, preventing embolism is a key in these patients. The two groups of drugs used to prevent embolism are oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets. The major secondary effect of both of these agents is bleeding, so a balance between preventing embolism and avoiding bleeding must be achieved. To make the correct decision scale CHA2DS2-VASc will help in the aid of embolism prevention and HASBLED scale will help in the bleeding evaluation. CHA2DS2-VASc punctuation equal or over 2 indicates necessity for oral anticoagulation and HASBLED equal or over 3 indicates a high risk of bleeding. The situation of high risk of embolism and high risk of bleeding is not infrequent and requires a correct management.

To give response to the question of what to do with patients with atrial fibrillation with a high risk of embolism and a high risk of bleeding, the main guidelines were reviewed: European Society of Cardiology [1], Up-todate [2], American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association [3], National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) [4] and Cochrane Database [5,6]. The conclusions are that the new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran) are the treatment of choice in these cases because the risk of bleeding of the new oral anticoagulants is lower when compared to warfarin and high risk of bleeding is not a reason for anticoagulant therapy exclusion.

References

Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Journal Metrics:

Impact Factor 1.34
Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) 123
SJR Total Cites 15
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 0.144
h-index (2023) 12
PubMed NLM ID:  10148499
Google Scholar h5 index: 6
Iindex Copernicus Value: 105.52


Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 1297

Interventional Cardiology received 1297 citations as per Google Scholar report


Interventional Cardiology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

flyer